Derecho del medio ambiente – Special jurisdiction for peace in Colombia – Depression symptoms in adults living with HIV
Lecturas sobre derecho del medio ambiente. Tomo XXV
Autora: Carolina Montes Cortés
Editorial: Universidad Externado de Colombia
Este libro es la consolidación de una de las colecciones más importantes del país en materia de derecho ambiental, con veinticinco tomos publicados de manera continua. Este tomo surge en un momento de especial relevancia para Colombia, pues con la realización de la cop16 el año 2024, con sede en Cali, se fortaleció el papel del país en la discusión global sobre biodiversidad y justicia ambiental, y se evidenció la urgencia de seguir aportando desde la academia a la comprensión de los retos que impone la actual crisis planetaria.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The concept of most responsible in international criminal law and its problematic reception in the Special Jurisdiction for Peace in Colombia
Autores:
Revista: Frontiers in Political Science
Editorial: Frontiers Media SA.
The article argues that the current conceptual ambiguity within the JEP’s legal framework risks conflating accomplices with principal offenders, which could undermine the selective justice model designed to focus on high-level perpetrators. Through a comparative analysis of international criminal tribunals, including the ICTY, ICTR, ICC, and SCSL, the article highlights the importance of clear definitions to avoid excessive judicialization and to align the process with the goals of peace, reconciliation, and restorative justice.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Associations Between Felt Stigma, Social Support, and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Adults Living with HIV
Autora: Susana Barradas
Revista: Trends in Psychology
Editorial: Springer Nature
The article argues that the current conceptual ambiguity within the JEP’s legal framework risks conflating accomplices with principal offenders, which could undermine the selective justice model designed to focus on high-level perpetrators. Through a comparative analysis of international criminal tribunals, including the ICTY, ICTR, ICC, and SCSL, the article highlights the importance of clear definitions to avoid excessive judicialization and to align the process with the goals of peace, reconciliation, and restorative justice.
